1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | suspected be under the influence of substances while caring for residents, they sent S2 for a drug test. LPA reviewed documentation which indicated that the drug test results of S2 were negative. LPA interviewed S2 who stated that they do not use drugs on the premises or while caring for residents. LPA interviewed R1 and R2 who both stated they do not suspect any staff members using drugs while caring for them or other residents.
In regards to allegation #3, LPA interviewed S1, S2, and Staff #3 (S3) who stated that narcotic drug counts are done 3 times a day, during every shift. S1, S2, and S3 also stated that medication counts are audited every so often. LPA reviewed documentation which indicated that medications were all accounted for. LPA interviewed R1 and R2 who stated they are getting all of their medications on time.
Based on evidence obtained during today’s visit, LPA has determined that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted via telephone and a copy was provided to Lara via email.
|