1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation, “Facility staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner”, the investigation revealed documentation that R1 was refusing food, water, care, and medications sporadically for several months and was sent to the hospital on 8/10/21. Although the PCP was made aware R1 was refusing medication and seeing specialists there was no documentation that the PCP was made aware of the refusal of food, water, and care as well. During interviews staff stated that R1 often refused to go to the hospital and should have been sent to the hospital sooner for changes in condition. The Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Physician concur that R1 should have been brought to the hospital sooner due to an altered level of consciousness.
Regarding allegation, “Staff did not provide care resulting in resident sustaining pressure injuries”, the investigation revealed that during R1’s hospitalization a wound care nurse noted 3 unstageable pressure injuries on R1’s sacrum measuring .5cm each and 1 stage 2 pressure injuries on the coccyx measuring 1.5 x .5cm.
Staff reported that the pressure injuries(s) were not observed until the day R1 was sent to the hospital on 8/10/21. While R1’s care plan dated June 2021, indicated some assistance with personal care and showering as needed, staff interviews were conflicting regarding the care assistance R1 actually needed and received. R1 was not receiving services from Home Health or Hospice for wound care and the PCP records do not indicate any wound care plans, and R1's skin integrity had not been checked.
Regarding allegation, “Neglect of resident leading to dehydration and hospitalization”, the investigation revealed R1 was admitted to the MICU for severe dehydration. The MICU Physician described R1 as pale, very skinny, and malnourished. The MICU Physician emphasized that it takes longer than a day for a person to be so dehydrated that they have to be seen in the MICU. R1’s Care Plan indicated that staff must monitor fluid intake, however, there were no facility records to indicate staff were providing hydration or documenting fluid intake.
Based on observation, interviews, and documentation the preponderance of evidence standards has been met; therefore, the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following civil penalty in the amount of $500.00 is assessed today and deficiencies are being cited on the attached 9099D during this visit. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due dates; additional civil penalties may be assessed. The facility staff was provided a copy of their rights (LIC9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of the report was given. |