1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on additional interview and record review, it was determined that Administrator engaged in a conversation with R1’s responsible person and informed responsible person that facility will not be accepting R1 back, and discussed possible alternative placement due to multiple episodes of falling, bladder infection, cognitive impairment, and frequent use of call button. However, R1 and R1’s responsible person did not receive a formal written eviction letter prior to or after R1’s hospitalization outlining reasons for eviction per regulation and facility’s admission agreement. At this time, R1 has not been accepted by facility for re-admission. Based on additional record review, it was determined that R1 was assessed as high fall risk and severe cognitive impairment, as well as various behavioral episodes. Upon further record review and interview, it was determined that facility did not complete a re-appraisal per regulatory requirements related to eviction procedures and so inform the R1's responsible person.
As a result of this investigation, it is determined that facility did not follow regulatory guidelines for the eviction process. Therefore, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Citation is issued under Title 22, Division 6. An exit interview was conducted with staff3 (S3). Administrator Kendra Noonan gave permission for S3 to sign in her absence at the time of this report delivery. A copy of this report was provided to S3. Appeal rights provided. |