1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | windows were opened for two days, excluding nights, to allow for the carpet to completely dry. Maintenance staff stated that the wet carpet smell was gone three days later, or by Thursday, 5/28/20, and there was no odor as of 6/26/20, when the interview was conducted. Maintenance staff asserted during the same interview that there is currently no mold in resident's room and the carpet does not need to be replaced. Another staff also stated that it was not certain if there was any mold underneath the carpet but was certain that there is not any mold above the carpet. A third staff stated they were one of the first staff to notice the flooding and immediately placed towels down to begin to absorb the water and noted that fans were used the next day to soak up additional water. A fourth staff interviewed did not recall the flooding nor seeing any mold or smelling any trapped moisture in resident's room.
LPA reviewed photos taken of resident's room on/around September 2020 and did not observe any mold on the carpet. Interviews concluded there were not any documented work orders on record relating to the flooding and shampooing of resident's room. Administrator stated if a maintenance issue is reported to the front desk, it would have been written in the maintenance book, but if it was observed from walking by the room, it may have not been documented. LPA was not able to observe resident's room in person during the investigation due to Covid 19 pre-cautionary measures in effect.
Based on information obtained during the investigation, LPA finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- a finding meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Exit interview with administrator. Copy of report provided. |