1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Mknelly review sample of call logs for June 1-4, 2021 and July 1-4/ 2021 found the following: June 1- 4 had a total of 52 calls recorded with a response time of greater than 20 minutes; July 1- 4 had a total of 54 calls recorded with a response time of greater than 20 minutes: Call log for 7/13/21 for R4 found that at 5:27:18 am, the resident’s call was made. The response time is recorded as 61.9 minutes. An indent report submitted on 7/17/21 of 7/13/21 notes that staff responded to R4 at approximately 6:30 am for shortness of breath secondary to respiratory condition which required emergency response and resulted in hospitalization.
On 10/14/21, LPA Calzada interviewed three (3) residents, 2 of 3 reported wait times in excess of 1 hour. While interviewing R 2 , R2 noted that they had been waiting 20 minutes for incontinence care when LPA arrived.
On 3/30/22, LPA Mknelly interviewed three (3) residents with recorded response times June 1-4/ 2021.
Two (2) of the three (3) residents stated that long wait times have happened and continue to happen.
A fourth resident was interviewed on 3/30/21 by LPA Mknelly regarding a resident report that they also experience long wait times. In the interview with R 3 , R3 stated that they regularly experience long wait times, they have reported that their button does not work. LPA and R3 tested the call button which was not in reach if R3 when LPA arrived. The button was pressed at 1:55 pm. Red light indicated a call was sent. No staff response at 2:40 pm. LPA spoke with a maintenance manager, Patrick Guevara, who acknowledged that the button should be tied to R3‘s bed and that he has checked the button several times and has ensured to works. LPA then went to the reception area where calls are monitored. Receptionist, Aylin Mendez, should LPA that no call was recorded for R 3. Receptionist recorded a repair request.
Therefore, this allegation is substantiated. |