1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Facility is falsifying staffing schedule.
LPA interviewed staff, reviewed employee files, and facility records to investigate this allegation. LPA found out that facility was falsifying facility staff records.
Per the medication administration records (MAR), it was documented that S1 administered insulin to R1 on 5/5/23, however, based on memory care schedule and S1’s timesheet, S1 had a day off on 5/5/23.
Additionally, facility listed S2 on memory care schedules to reflect that facility was meeting staffing ratio requirements per the stipulation agreement adopted on January 5, 2023. Based on stipulation agreement, the facility is required to have (3) three direct care staff working AM and PM shifts and (2) two direct care staff working NOC shifts. Based on staffing schedules reviewed, facility listed S2 on the schedule April 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 14, 15, 21, 22, 28, and 29 as a direct care staff for memory care. S2 is facility management and staff interviews indicated that S2 was not working in a direct care staff capacity during the listed dates above. Furthermore, facility could not provide sufficient documentation that S2 worked at the facility during the dates above as S2 is a salary employee and no timesheets are generated. Based on the information obtained. The facility falsified staffing records therefore LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The deficiencies are cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6.
Exit interview with administrator. Appeals rights provided. Copy of the report provided to facility. |