1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on the documents reviewed and the interviews conducted, LPA learned that R1 developed a fungal rash which was treated by a prescription cream. This was not due to neglect of incontinence care. Staff interviews conducted revealed that R1's care plan appropriately addresses her incontinence needs. At times, R1 has behaviors and will not allow staff to provide routine care. Additionally, hospice staff interviewed acknowledged that there were no concerns regarding her incontinence care at the facility.
LPA reviewed the eviction notice served to the resident and POA. Additionally, the Department conducted a case management visit on 7/13/2021 where the eviction notice was discussed with the facility. The eviction letter did not contain the required wording, which made the eviction invalid. While an unlawful eviction notice was served to the resident, Resident is still resides at the facility.
The Department has determined that the above allegations are unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the
allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence
to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
Exit interview conducted. A copy this report was left at the facility. Appeal rights were given. |