1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to records reviewed and staff interviews, resident (R1’s) catheter was observed to be leaking on 8/15/23 for an unknown reason and Home Health was notified. On 8/16/23, Home Health did not conduct a visit with R1. On 8/16/23, staff reported to facility manager that R1 had a decrease in urine output, which was not common. However, no further attempts were made by the facility to contact Home Health. Also, the facility did not seek medical attention for R1’s decrease in urine output or the leaking catheter. On 8/17/23, staff reported R1 continued to have a decrease in urine output and appeared pale and ill. Despite R1’s symptoms, R1 was transported to day program and the facility did not communicate the reported information to Home Health, R1’s day program, or R1’s responsible party.
Upon arrival to day program, the program staff immediately observed R1 was ill and had no urine output in their catheter. Day program staff notified R1’s responsible party. Subsequently, R1 was sent to the hospital and diagnosed with severe sepsis secondary to pseudomonas bacteremia, an acute kidney injury, and a tear at the urethral meatus.
The facility’s Catheter Care Policy states that staff will “monitor skin area where catheter is inserted for any redness or swollen discharge, if any of those indication appear you must notify Med Tech immediately.” Home Health records and interview with Home Health nurse indicated that staff were trained to wash the catheter, including the bag, tubing, and penis daily, checking for signs of infection such as discharge or leaking urine. However, multiple staff interviews indicated that staff were not trained to check or wash the area where R1’s catheter was inserted in the penis. Multiple staff indicated that they did not conduct regular checks on R1’s catheter insertion site and did not observe a tear in R1’s urethral meatus.
Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. As a result of the resident’s serious bodily injury, an immediate civil penalty per Health and Safety Code § 1548 in the amount of $500 for the date of 2/12/24 is assessed for a violation that the Department determines resulted in the injury or illness of a person in care. An additional civil penalty assessment is under review and a determination is pending. LPA will return on a future date to assess an additional civil penalty if warranted.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. |