1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Moreover, resident 1 (R1) has no concerns with facility not meeting (R1)’s hygiene needs and stated that staff 1 (S1) assist with (R1)’s hygiene needs and that (S1) “does a really good job.” Based on (R1) Client Care Daily Checklist, for the month of December 2023, (R1) received two showers per week and (R1) refused shaving and nail trim. For the month of January 2024, (R1) received two to three showers per week and (R1) refused shaving and nail trim. For the month of February 2024 (R1) received two to three showers per week and (R1) refused shaving and nail trim. Based on observation on 02/06/2023, LPA Lee observed all four residents in the home appeared to be clean with no odor. LPA Lee toured all four resident bedrooms and did not observe any odor in residents’ bedrooms. (R1) also appeared to be clean and had no bodily odor. (R1) was wearing jeans with a gray plaid shirt. (R1)’s hair was comb and appeared clean. During today’s visit 03/19/2024, (R1) also appeared clean and groomed.
The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6, no deficiencies were cited.
A copy of this report was provided, along with Appeal Rights and LIC 811, the Confidential Names List.
Exit interview. |