1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During interviews, Nonu, S1, and R1’s RP all said that R1’s medications were not filled due to insurance issues preventing prescriptions from being written. During an interview, Nonu said that R1 did not have a primary doctor upon arrival, which prevented refills from being filled. Nonu said attempts were made to fill medications through urgent care. During an interview, S1 said that a meeting was held with R1’s social worker in an attempt to make arrangements for refills. During an interview, R1’s RP said that R1 arrived at the facility with no refills prescribed, and R1 could not get new refills because R1 did not have a primary doctor. R1’s RP said that R1 could not get a primary doctor because R1’s RP needed proof of insurance and proof of income documentation, which could not be immediately obtained by R1’s RP.
LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s LIC 602. The LIC 602 appeared to be complete. R1’s RP said during an interview that the doctor who filled out the form provided inaccurate information.
The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations that staff did not ensure resident’s medications are being filled, and that staff did not ensure resident’s physician’s report was complete upon admissions:
Based on interviews and record review, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED, which means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
No deficiencies were cited regarding the above allegations. An exit interview was held with Nonu and a copy of this report was left with Dowe-Rose. |