1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Facility staff interviews demonstrated staff were aware of resident’s wounds on thighs and had communicated with home health agency on 8/4/23 that was already providing wound care for R1 for preexisting wounds. As all community care licensed facilities are non-medical, facility staff were not trained to provide wound care and provided documented outreach to home health agencies responsible for wound care. Home health did not diagnose the injuries to R1’s thighs as pressure injuries but as “trauma skin injury”. Facility and home health records indicate Home health visits for wound care occurred on 8/7/23, 8/9/23, 8/14/23, 8/15/23 and 8/18/23. Prior to R1 being sent to the hospital for treatment on 8/21/23 the facility provided multiple attempts at reaching R1’s home health agency for wound care as documentation in facility records indicate the staff members did not believe the wounds observed were healing and were deteriorating per facility notes for R1.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of neglect/Lack of Supervision are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed.
There are no deficiencies is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22.
Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility. |