1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff 1(S1) came back to check on R1, noticing R1 on the bathroom floor. After this incident R1's responsible party and Physician stated R1 needed 24/7 supervision.
Regarding the allegation of Residents are sustaining unexplained injuries while in care, the Department found the following: based on interviews and record review, it was determined that Resident 2(R2), Resident 3(R3), and Resident 4(R4) injuries were due to falls. Resident 2(R2), Resident 3(R3), and Resident 4(R4) are all memory care residents. R2, R3, and R4 use assistive walking devices (ie cane or walker). There were incident reports for each of there falls explaining what happened.
Regarding the allegation of Residents are being left unattended for an extended period of time, the Department found the following: based on interviews it was determined that R1's responsible party observed memory care residents eating alone when eating their meals. R1's responsible party felt memory care residents should have staff sitting with them while eating. Administrator stated that all residents in memory care are able to feed themselves and eat on their own.
Regarding the allegation of Staff did not safeguard residents personal property, the Department found the following: based on interview, it was determined that Administrator offered to safeguard R1's hearing aid, keeping it in the medication cart, but R1's responsible party refused to do that.
LPA has deemed the complaint findings as UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened and/or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted with Administrator Michelle Swearingen. A copy of this report was left with Administrator upon exit. |