1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Resident was hit by another resident due to lack of supervision
Interview with the Administrator indicated that the facility does not have any incident reports involving peer aggression between residents (R2 and R1). Interviews with S2, S4 and staff (S7) indicated that they have never heard of or witnessed any incidents of R2 hitting R1. Staff are unaware of any incidents of peer aggression between R2 and R1.
Allegation: Resident sustained injury requiring stitches due to staff negligence
According to Special Incident Report and staff interviews, on March 27, 2024, S3 and S5 had taken resident (R3) on a van ride outing. S5 was driving and S3 was the passenger in the van, while R3 was sitting in the third row of the van. R3 lunged forward from the back seat striking S5 causing them to brake hard. R3 hit their head on the dash, due to S5 braking, and had minor bleeding to their forehead. R3 was blocking with the Ukeru pad so S3 was able to place their arm in between S5 and R3 prevented R3 from hitting S5 further. S5 was able to move the van to a safe location and contacted emergency medical services. R3 was transported to the hospital and returned home later that day with instructions for follow-up with their primary care provider. Interviews with staff indicated that R3 has exhibited this type of behavior in the past. Staff interviews also indicated that they do not believe that S5 would have purposely “brake checked” R3.
Allegation: Staff do not ensure that resident’s toileting needs are being met
Interview with the Administrator indicated that all clients use the restroom independently. Interviews with Administrator, S2, S4, and S7 indicated that there are no residents that are incontinent at the care home. Interviews with Administrator, S2, S4, and S7 indicated that R3 would never stay in soiled clothing. Interviews indicated that R3 is very clean and bathes often. Interviews indicated that R3 fixates on bathing and changing into clean clothing. Staff do not believe that R3 would stay in feces for an extended period of time.
Based on interviews conducted and documentation obtained, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided. |