1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Administrator, S1 – S6 all deny that R1 wore 3 diapers at a time. However, they all concur that there was a pad added to the diaper that was provided by the responsible party.
Staff stated that R1 urinated a lot and was hard to coach to the bathroom without responsible parties assistance. Staff also stated that R1 was assisted with incontinence 3-4 times a day, 3 times at night and during the incontinence care, 1 pull-up with a liner inside was used at the suggestion of the responsible party.
The Administrator and the facility RN stated every time R1 was assisted with incontinence, the bedding would also need to be changed and that several pads called “chucks” were used as part of the bedding. Staff also stated that R1 would have episodes of removing a portion of the diaper to urinate outside of it.
LPA observed the facility care notes that indicated R1 was being assisted with incontinence care between every 1-2 ½ hours from 2/18/2020-2/23/2020. Interviews also concluded that resident was assisted to the bathroom or had a diaper change. Interviews and documentation did not reveal that R1 wore 3 diapers and/or pull-ups at a time.
As a result of the investigation of this allegation, the preponderance of evidence has not been met. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies are being cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with Marites Ornellas via telephone and a copy of this report was provided via email and an electronic email read receipt confirms receiving these documents. |