1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA conducted an interview with RP who did not provide many specifics other than food items being left out for extended periods of time and states there are picture to support the allegations. At the time of writing LPA still has yet to receive documentation from Reporting Party. LPA reviewed 3rd party audits and reviewed two recent reports from the auditing agency dated February 2025 and May 2025. Per the audit reports, the initial February audit the facility received a score of 87 percent with recommendations for deep cleaning in some areas but related to the allegations described. The audit found no errors or deficiencies with food storage/preparation. The second audit dated May 2025 the kitchen received a score of 98 percent with all deep cleaning items addressed.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Food Service are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed.
There are no deficiencies is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22.
Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility. |