1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During that investigation, C1 did not disclose how the bruise occurred. LPA Lee interviewed three out of four clients, none of whom reported witnessing staff handling residents roughly or in a manner that resulted in injuries. When asked directly if anyone at the facility was hurting them, C1 stated, “No.” Records review and interviews further indicated that C1 has a history of challenging behaviors, including self-injurious actions such as hand-biting and arm-scratching. It was also noted that C1 has fair, sensitive skin that bruises easily. During observations, no bruise was observed on C1, and staff to resident interactions appeared appropriate. An outside agency representative reported no concerns about the facility and confirmed that C1 has a known history of self-injurious behaviors. Additionally, C1’s responsible party expressed no concerns regarding the allegation and stated that the facility is doing its best to meet C1’s needs. Based on the interviews and statements conducted during the investigation process LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation that staff are handling residents roughly resulting injuries.
The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Egberuare, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. |