1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | One of the residents stated they saw E1 about one year ago but could not remember the exact date. This resident explained that they saw E1 outside the facility picking up a trailer. During the visit, the LPA observed a trailer in the facility driveway. LPA also interviewed staff. One staff member stated they know E1 and E2 but had not seen them at this facility.
This staff reported seeing E2 at another facility around April 2025 but could not remember the exact date. Other staff members confirming knowing E1 and E2 but stated they have not seen them at this facility since employment but seen them at other facilities a long time ago but could not estimate when.
A review of the facility's LIC 500 Personnel Report showed that neither E1 nor E2 was listed as facility staff. In addition, during the LPA's visits on February 19, February 27, March 20, and July 17, 2026, neither E1 nor E2 was observed at the facility, and there were no reports confirming their presence. Based on the evidence gathered, there is not enough information to support the allegation that the facility allowed excluded individuals to work at the facility. Therefore, this allegation was unsubstantiated.
********************************************************************** Allegation - Staff are forging resident documents:
The investigation into this allegation consisted of interviews and record verification. On July 17, 2026, LPA contacted the physicians' offices where each resident received their Medical Assessment (LIC 602A) to verify that the residents had been seen by the listed physicians. Five of the six residents were confirmed by the medical offices. For one resident, the information could not be fully verified because the clinic had a different last name and address on file, although the birth date matched. Therefore, the verification for that resident was inconclusive. Interviews with staff could not confirm whether staff, the administrator or anyone working at this facility, had forged resident documents.
Based on the evidence gathered, there is not enough information to support the allegation that staff forging resident documents. Therefore, this allegation is unsubstantiated.
A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
Exit interview was conducted with Unaisi Waqalala and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
{2 of 2} |