1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Additionally, resident interviews affirmed their satisfaction with the food provided. One resident stated the food as nutritious.
Inspection of food supply: On several visits on 8/14/24, 7/18/24, and 5/9/24, conducted by this LPA revealed facility to have a well-stocked refrigerator and freezer containing different vegetables, meats, breakfast items, fruits, eggs, milk, juices and snacks. Inspection of their pantry include Included non-perishable items such as canned foods, boxed pastas, cereals, and rice, as well as fresh potatoes and onions.
Meal observations: LPA observed the meal preparations on different visits. One observation where ground meat and a variety of fresh vegetables were being cooked. During the same visit, residents' lunch was observed with a balanced meal including a bologna sandwich, salad, chips, and juice. Residents (R4 and R5) expressed satisfaction with the food quality, describing it as nutritious and enjoyable. Also during today's visit, LPA observed S1 prepared chicken burger for residents' lunch along with chips and pudding and choice of beverages.
Based on interviews, observations of food preparation and supply, and feedback from residents, there was not preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegation that staff do not ensure that residents receive adequate quality and quantity of food and liquid. The facility appears to be meeting residents' dietary needs, with appropriate food supplies and positive feedback from residents. However, LPA is unable to determine if this practice is sustained daily, therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Note that a finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with S1 and a copy of this report was provided.
{2 of 2} |