1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Additional interview with the facility administrator/licensee revealed that approximately one month elapsed between the initial observation of the wound and R1 being transported to the emergency room for further medical evaluation. Interviews with outside parties indicated that wound care provided within the facility was insufficient to meet R1’s medical needs and that a higher level of medical treatment was necessary. R1 developed an infection associated with the prolonged presence of the wound and remained hospitalized for over the two months for treatment. Based on the information gathered during this investigation, this allegation was observed not in compliance with Title 22 regulation: 87465(a)(1) Incidental Medical and Dental Care as the facility did not ensure timely medical care for R1 after staff observed worsening of R1’s condition requiring further treatment.
Allegation: Staff did not report incident to appropriate parties
It was alleged that staff did not report incident to appropriate parties. This investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, and records review. On 2/6/2026 LPA Lee conducted a visit to the facility and collected resident records for R1. On 4/02/2026, SIA Hammond conducted interviews with 3 out of 3 facility staff. Staff (S1) stated while assisting R1 with activities of daily living (ADLs), bruising were observed on R1’s toes and the facility administrator was notified of the concern. S1 stated that facility staff initiated wound care treatment within the facility, however, R1’s symptoms continued to worsen over time. Interview with Staff (S2) revealed that R1’s Responsible Party (RP) was not notified immediately after the wound was initially observed, as staff did not believe the condition appeared severe at that time. S2 revealed that they were notified by facility staff that R1’s condition continued to worsen over time, in which R1's, RP were eventually notified. Additional interviews revealed that approximately one month elapsed between the initial observation of the wound, notification to the POA and transport of R1 for medical evaluation. Records review revealed that on 7/11/2025, R1 was transported to UC Davis Medical Center due to an open wound on the left great toe requiring further medical treatment. Based on the information and evidence gathered during this investigation this was not observed in compliance with Title 22 regulation 87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities as the facility did not ensure timely notification of R1’s worsening medical condition.
As a result, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Geoffrey and a copy of the LIC 9099, LIC 9099-D pages and appeal rights were provided to facility, a copy of this report will be emailed to the facility licensee/administrator.
|