1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | There was not sufficient evidence that the signal system was not working during the time the complaint was received by CCL. However, the signal system was checked, and working in residents room and on the main switch board during this visit. LPA conducted interviews of residents, staff, and Administrator during this visit.
Based on records review, interviews and lack of evidence the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met; therefore, the above allegation(s) is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. |