1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed that (R1)’s Primary Care Provider (PCP) comes to the facility once a week for (R1)’s primary visits and to refill (R1)’s medications. On 05/02/2023 (R1)’s PCP informed the facility that (R1) needed to be referred to an Ophthalmologist for (R1) Glaucoma. It was also learned that (R1) can only be referred to a VA Ophthalmologist; therefore, (R1) had to be reestablish with a VA PCP to get referred to a VA Ophthalmologist. Based on records review, on 07/12/2023, the facility was able to establish a VA PCP for (R1). In addition, (R1) was also referred to a VA Ophthalmologist and had an appointment on 09/21/2023, per (R1)’s prior PCP recommendation. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegations.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegation regarding staff did not ensure that residents received medical attention while in care is unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no deficiencies were observed during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.
|