1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | home, R1 told staff that they wanted to see the doctor about their arm. On 3/5 in the care notes, staff wrote that R1 told staff they were going to call an ambulance. Staff told R1 "just need to clean the wound and put medicine on it but she ignore staff."
This LPA learned through interviews that staff did contact a doctor and that an appointment was set up approximately a week later, however R1 was requesting immediate medical attention and had a right to see a doctor upon request. R1 was observed by an outside agency to have a fluid filled blister, the size of which was between a nickel and a dime, on R1's shoulder. R1 was complaining of pain and wanted to be taken to a doctor for evaluation. No one at the facility had the authority to make the decision to deny R1 medical attention.
The standard for the preponderance of evidence has been met, the allegation, "Resident was denied medical treatment for a wound sustained while in care," has been substantiated.
According to the California Code of Regulations, this deficiency is cited on the LIC 9099 D page. A copy of this report along with APPEAL Rights were provided and an exit interview was conducted.
|