1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ...Continued from LIC 9099
LPA interviewed 3 individuals from an outside agency. Based on their interviews, LPA learned that information provided was reported by residents and the alleged incidents were not observed by them. R1 is known to make false statements; however, all statements are looked into seriously. R1 was observed to have scratches and bruising on R1's back by outside agency staff. According to the outside agency observation, the marks were observed a few days after the incident. During the observation, the outside agency staff was unable to interview resident's alone due to facility staff being in the room and not leaving to give privacy. According to facility staff, they are not allowed to leave any of the resident's alone. According to resident's care plan, the staff are required to provide supervision at all times.
LPA reviewed Shared Information Reports. It was learned that R1 was engaging in behaviors, such as kicking cars, hitting staff, and falling on the ground. As staff attempted to help R1, R1 kicked the staff while dragging self, which cause the scrape on R1's back.
Due to the above noted information, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, and therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, no deficiencies cited.
An exit interview was held with Administrator Monalyn, and a copy of report was left at the facility. |