1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from page 3, LIC 9099 - C
LPA interviewed Staff 3 (S3). S3 was present during the incident and did not observe R1 hitting neighboring cars and did not leave without staff supervision.
LPA Valerio reviewed Unusual Incident Report, Shared Information Report, and Behaviorist Incident Report. The information regarding the incident aligned with the statements provided by the staff and did not indicate R1 was without staff supervision.
LPA Valerio reviewed the Regional Office electronic files for Unusual Incident Reports (UIR). The Regional Office has not received any UIRs regarding R1 leaving the facility without staff supervision.
LPA Valerio reviewed Facility Records for R1. R1 is required a high level of care and supervision. R1 receives 1:1 Direct Care staff, 20/hour per month of staff Behaviorist, Consultant (non-behaviorist), outside activities that consists of an LMFT, Recreational Therapist, Dietician, Registered Nurse, Music Therapy Group, Music Therapy 1:1, personal chef and access to a privately funded physician. R1 has 1-3 staff present at all time when going out into the community.
LPA Valerio interviewed a neighbor that witnessed the incident on 12/20/2023, Witness 2 (W2). According to the interview, W2 stated R1 was beating on hoods. W2 saw R1 pounding on that Witness one (W1)'s car telling W1 that R1 was going to kill W1. Then R1 rushed to my car telling me R1 was going to kill me. Then you got the staff yelling at me telling me to get back in the car. Telling me to get back in my car for safety. This is our neighborhood, and this place was illegally placed in our neighborhood. When R1 was beating on the car of the neighbor, I went up to the home. No one was even in the home. I looked inside. There were tables flipped. W2 stated a video recording was taken on W2's phone. However, W2 could not locate the video on their phone to provide LPA Valerio for evidence and mentioned that the video could have been deleted. W2 stated R1 has been seen walking down W2's private driveway with staff. W2 states even though it is private property, the staff and R1 still walk there because they cannot walk on the main road. W2 stated the neighborhood is not safe for children because of the facility. W2 stated the neighborhood has a neighborhood watch program to ensure they are kept safe from the residents. W2 states no one informed the neighborhood of the facility when it first opened.
Continues on LIC 9099 -C, page 5 |