1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | {Con't from LIC9099-A}
Allegation: Staff make resident stay in room:
Throughout this investigation, LPA conducted unannounced visits on 2/15/24, 5/15/24, and 5/22/24. LPA observed residents in care going in and out of their bedrooms and were roaming around the facility at various times. During a visit on 2/15/24, LPA observed Resident#1 (C1) and staff doing outdoor activities in the backyard. Per interview with staff on 2/15/24, C1’s preferred choice of activity is using their iPad. However, staff stated that they offer other activities to C1 such as helping with laundry, cleaning, wiping down tables, reading book to C1, coloring, listening to music, and exercise such as going for walks outside. Record reviews also indicated that C1 participates in community activities such as going to the park, shopping, going out for haircut and dining out.
Based on interviews, record reviews and observations, there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that staff make resident stay in their room. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the violations may have occurred as reported the preponderance of evidence standard was not met.
Allegation: Staff are not allowing family to visit resident.
Throughout this investigation, LPA conducted records reviews and staff interviews. Per review of the facility’s visitors sign in log from 4/3/22 to 1/31/24, resident’s family members have visited residents in care as evidenced by the presence of signatures of visitors. Note that not all residents in care receive visitors on a regular basis and some do not received visitors at the facility. A review of C1’s documents indicated that C1 can receive visitors. Further review of C1’s documents revealed that visitations for C1 are required to be scheduled, supervised, and at a neutral place and not at the care facility. Based on interview, the administrator attempted to locate appropriate neutral places for where the visitation for C1 can take place such as at a police station. Based on interviews and record reviews, several attempts have been made to accommodate visitations for C1, including visitation via video conference. However, based on interviews and record reviews, these attempted or offered visits never took place due to C1's visitor not complying with the terms of the visit.
Based on interviews, and record reviews, there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that staff are not allowing family to visit resident. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the violations may have occurred as reported the preponderance of evidence standard was not met.
An exit interview was conducted with Pearl Ofodire, administrator and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
|