1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation, “Staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care” Community Care Licensing conducted interviews which revealed that R1 provided conflicting information regarding being spoken to by the perpetrator. Staff #1 (S1-S2,S4-S11) all concur that R1 was not spoken to inappropriately in the facility. Resident #2 (R2-R6) may not be credible witnesses for this investigation at this time due to diagnosis of dementia. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation.
Regarding allegation, “Staff hit resident in care” Community Care Licensing conducted interviews which revealed that R1 provided conflicting information regarding being hit by the perpetrator. Staff #1 (S1-S2,S4-S11) all concur that R1 was not spoken to inappropriately in the facility by staff. Resident #2 (R2-R6) may not be credible witness for this investigation at this time due to diagnosis of dementia. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation.
Regarding allegation, “Staff does not ensure that residents are adequately fed” On 2/15/22, during a Required 1-year inspection, LPA observed a supply of 2 day perishables and 7 day non-perishables. During todays visit, LPA observed a supply of 2 day perishables and 7 day non-perishables and residents preparing for lunch. Staff #1 (S1-S2,S4-S11) all concur that R1 ate well in the facility. Resident #2 (R2-R6) may not be credible witness for this investigation at this time due to diagnosis of dementia. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation.
The investigation revealed that there was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations.
Based on interviews and documentation, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met.
“This agency has investigated the complaint alleging, the above-mentioned allegation(s). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint.”
Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no violations were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. |