1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with five staff members and five residents. All staff interviewed denied excluded individuals presence at the facility. Some staff members interviewed had no knowledge of the individuals. The five residents interviewed and due to cognitive impairments were unable to provide any substantive information related to the allegation.
four of the five staff interviewed knew who the administrator is and identified her most recent date. LPA attempted interviews with five residents who were unable to provide substantive information due to cognitive impairments. Based on LPAs history with the facility and history of inspections, LPA has determined the facility administrator or their designee were present at approximately 80 percent of inspections within the last 12 months.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Other are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed.
There are no deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22.
Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility. |