1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | attention and she informed the LPA that a resident had just had an accident in the hallway and staff had just cleaned and disinfected the area. LPA found another caregiver to assist with ventilating the space. After completing the walkthrough, this LPA returned to her workstation.
Regarding the allegation: "Staff did not provide resident's authorized representative with resident's records in a timely manner." During the course of this investigation, this LPA learned that most bills were sent out electronically via email on either the 23rd or 24th of the month. LPA was also told that if a resident or POA preferred to have a paper bill mailed instead, they would do that. This LPA learned through interviews that many residents secured their rooms with the Assisted Living Waiver Program (ALWP). They had a care coordinator who assisted them with the transition and the cost was assessed based on the resident's income. Room and board were established at a set price that was direct billed to that program on a month to month basis.
This LPA further learned that if a resident were self-pay, a clinical assessment would have been completed by members of the administrative team to determine the level of care needed and a monthly fee would have been established. Fees were billed between the 1st and the 7th of each month for all but one resident. (One resident requested a different billing date, and that was honored.) Staff also shared that if there was a change in condition for a self-paying resident, a new assessment would have been done and a new fee would have been assessed. The Financial Power of Attorney would have been informed of the new bill rate by the Administration. This LPA asked what the turnaround time was if a resident requested a copy of their bill be emailed to them. This LPA was told that usually a request like that could be taken care of the same day, but it might take up to 24 hours if the Business Office was exceptionally busy.
This LPA called the number provided by the complainant for additional details to assist in this investigation, and no further information could be obtained. The standard for the preponderance of the evidence was not met and the Department finds this allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6, no deficiencies were cited.
A copy of this report was provided, along with Appeal Rights and the LIC 811, the Confidential Names List.
Exit interview. |