1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | fans throughout the facility to assist with keeping the residents hydrated and cool.
LPA observed Housekeepers in both Assisted Living and Memory Care. Med Techs were stationed outside of the two respective dining rooms. LPA observed approximately 30 residents being served lunch in the Assisted Living dining room and 12 in the Memory Care dining room. Additional residents were still arriving for lunch. LPA observed 3 Carestaff assisting residents in Memory Care and 3 in Assisted Living.
Regarding the allegation: Facility did not protect resident from humiliation or abuse.
In early June of 2022, it was alleged that a MedTech working in Memory Care brought a male resident into a partially dressed female resident's room as a way to get the male resident to take his medication. This LPA interviewed 8 staff (current and former) as well as a member of another reporting agency. None of the staff interviewed could corroborate that the above incident happened. This LPA conducted a search of the electronic files for the summer of 2022 and could not find any LIC 624 or SOC 341 reports that matched this allegation. All Carestaff and MedTechs were mandated reporters by law and were required to report incidents of abuse. As this was said to have occurred over 2 years ago, many of the staff that had worked in memory care in 2022 were no longer at Legacy Oaks and difficult to reach. The standard for the preponderance of evidence was not met and the department found this allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation: Facility did not ensure the privacy of residents in care when staff brought another resident into a resident's room without permission.
As this allegation was related to the prior one, the department found it too, to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation: Facility did not protect the dignity of residents in care.
As this allegation was related to the first one, the department found it too, to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
|