1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Facility administrator is not providing adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility and care.
This LPA was at the facility on the following days opening and / or investigating complaints: 11/08/23, 11/21/23,12/05/23, and 12/06/23. This LPA also participated in a meeting on 11/09/23 where Community Care Licensing learned that the management company, Ally Senior Living, was being brought in to assist in bringing Legacy Oaks into compliance.
The current Designated Facility Administrator, Ashley Sylve began her employment at Legacy Oaks on 12/12/23. This LPA was also present at the facility on 12/12/23, 12/20/23, 12/27/23, and 1/05/24. During the month of December members of Ally Senior Living were frequently on site to assist with on boarding their new Executive Director (ED), Ashley Sylve. Along with reviewing, correcting and updating the facilities current policies and procedures, the ED was tasked with implementing the many plans of correction for the outstanding deficiencies that were cited or occurred prior to her arrival. Much of this work required research and communication with various departments, individual staff, as well as with the licensees. Through personal observation, interviews, and a review of records, the new ED along with assistance from vice presidents from Ally, hired new staff, retrained existing staff, and administered medications from the med cart when necessary.
Through interviews, this LPA learned that if a resident wanted to speak with the ED, they could either walk into her office if her door was open, or let the Concierge know at the front desk, and they would communicate the request to the ED. The ED would usually seek them out within 24 hours. This LPA has seen residents the ED's office, waiting outside of the office for a meeting, and speaking with the Concierge to relay a message that they would like to meet with the ED.
The standard for the preponderance of evidence could not be found and the department found the above allegation: "Facility administrator is not providing adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility and care," to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
According to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no deficiencies were observed or cited during today's visit. A copy of this report was provided along with APPEAL RIGHTS. Exit interview. |