1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA observed 2 maintenance workers, 2 housekeepers, and 3 carestaff. In Memory Care, this LPA observed 9 residents in the dining area, 3 of whom were playing cards with 1 care staff. LPA observed 3 residents walking the length of the Memory Care area, 2 more care staff as well as the Director of Memory Care.
Regarding the allegation: "Due to lack of supervision, residents have eloped from the facility."
This LPA reviewed incident reports in Community Care Licensing's (CCL's) electronic files for the months of December 2023, and January and February of 2024, specifically looking for reports regarding elopements. LPA obtained copies of 5 incident reports pertaining to the resident mentioned in this complaint (R1). This LPA also looked for reports for a nameless female resident mentioned in the complaint. For each of the elopement dates listed in the complaint there was a corresponding incident report which explained the circumstances surrounding R1's exiting of the building and the names of the staff members who accompanied R1.
This LPA also reviewed the staff schedule and time cards for the agency staff that was hired to assist with staffing during the time of the complaint. The LPA conducted 8 private interviews. Some of those interviewed were permanent Legacy Oaks Memory Care staff, others were staff who were no longer working at the facility, and others were agency staff hired for that time period to work in Memory Care and now work elsewhere.
All of those interviewed stated that there were no elopements during the time period of the complaint. All stated that R1 was exit seeking and had left the facility on multiple occasions, but that staff always accompanied R1 and R1 never left the building without supervision. 4 of the 8 individuals interviewed stated they had walked with R1 while attempting to redirect R1 back to Memory Care. This LPA also learned during the course of this investigation that 4 of the 8 individuals interviewed were assigned as 1-1 caregivers to R1. A 1-1 caregiver also reduced the possibility of R1 leaving the facility unsupervised.
This LPA also asked all interviewees if they had any knowledge of a female resident leaving the facility unsupervised during the time of the complaint and all said that they had not heard of any residents eloping during the time of the complaint.
|