1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | At least one staff member stated that they had not seen E1 at the facility since employment but stated they saw E2 at the property about one month earlier or at least one time since starting work. This staff stated when E2 was here E2 remained outside with a maintenance person and did not enter the facility and that only the maintenance person went inside; they could not confirm whether E2 had any contact with residents.
Additional interviews was conducted on July 22, 2026 where one resident who stated who also confirmed, after being shown photos of E1 and E2, R6 stated they did not recognize either individual and had not seen them at this facility since admission.
A review of the facility's LIC 500 Personnel Report found that E1 and E2 were not listed as employees. During facility visits on February 19, 2026, June 10, 2026, and July 22, 2026, no excluded individuals were observed at the facility and there were no reports that E1 or E2 were working there.
Based on interviews, record review, and observations, there was not enough evidence to show that the facility allowed excluded individuals to work in the facility. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
**************************************************************************** Allegation - Staff are forging resident documents:
The investigation into this allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews.
On July 22, 2026, LPA Villanueva contacted the medical offices listed on the residents' Medical Assessments (LIC 602A) to verify whether the residents had been seen by their physicians. Some residents receive medical care through Kaiser and Dignity Health. The representatives stated they could not release or verify patient information because of their privacy policies. At least one resident receives care through a clinic which confirmed the resident's medical assessment information to be accurate. Two other residents receive care through another clinic and they were able to verify these residents in their care.
Interviews with staff members on February 19, 2026 and July 22, 2026, they stated they were not aware of any staff or the administrator forging resident documents or asking them to alter or change resident records.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation, there was not enough evidence to show that staff were forging resident documents. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
Exit interview was conducted with Esther Tabua and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
{2 of 2} |