1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continues from LIC 9099
After coming home from day program, R1 became agitated and started behaving aggressively towards staff. A total of seven (7) staff were involved to assist the situation, including the house behaviorist. Police were contacted and arrived hours later. R1 was transported to the hospital and returned the same day. Based on the SIR, the staff involved did not touch R1 at any point during the crisis.
On 08/29/2024, LPA Valerio interviewed R1. R1 reported that staff treat R1 good, replied no when asked if any staff ever hit R1, and replied no when asked if staff ever physically touched R1. R1 stated R1 remembered the day on 08/21/24. R1 reported R1 slept all day. R1 did not report any negative emotions towards any of the staff.
LPA Valerio interviewed Staff 1, Staff 2, Staff 3, and Staff 4. Based on staff interviews, interviewed corroborate details explained the SIR for 08/21/2024. S1 stated that S1 does not believe that S4 hurt R1. However, S4 was suspended until the investigation was complete. S2 was present during the incident. S2 reported that S4 did not hit R1. R1 hit S4. S3 reported working on 08/22/2024. S3 stated no restraints were used on R1 during the incident. S3 did not hear or observe that S4 hit R1.
Due to the above noted information, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, and therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, no deficiencies cited. Exit interview was held and a copy of report was left at the facility. |