1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1 did not have an updated LIC 602 as of 12/14/23. LPA Moleski reviewed R1's file on 1/4/24 and observed a new LIC 602 dated 12/18/23.
LPA Moleski reviewed this facility’s plan of operation. Page two of the plan of operation, under a heading entitled "basic services provided," states that the facility shall "plan, arrange and/or provide transportation to medical and dental appointments" and provide "assistance in meeting necessary medical and dental needs." LPA Moleski reviewed this facility's dementia care plan of operation. Page four of this document states that "residents with dementia will have an evaluation and reappraisal of their dementia care needs annually ... or more often as required."
During an interview, R1 said R1 could not see well and R1’s glasses do not help. During an interview, Houston said R1 had glasses, but did not wear them. During an interview, S1 said S1 was aware of R1’s vision issues, and said R1’s vision is sometimes “blurry.” S1 said S1 reads R1’s mail for R1. During an interview, a VA nurse said R1 did not have any upcoming medical appointments. The VA nurse was not aware of any currently ongoing issues regarding R1’s vision.
Title 22 Section 87466 states: "The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When changes … are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician.”
The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegation that staff are not taking a resident to their doctor:
Based on interviews and record review, facility staff did not plan or arrange for medical appointments for R1 as necessary, and therefore, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of evidence standard has been met.
This facility is being cited per 22 CCR Sections 87705(c)(5) and 87466. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was left with Assa. |