1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Lee interviewed (R1)’s responsible party who has no concern with staff not assisting (R1) with incontinence care. LPA Lee interviewed (R1) hospice nurse who has no concerns with (R1) not getting (R1) incontinence care needs from facility staff. (R1) Care Notes revealed that (R1) is getting assistance with prompting to use the bathroom along with getting brief changed throughout the day; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred.
Allegation: Staff do not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met
It was alleged that staff do not ensure that residents’ dietary needs are met. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, interviews with staff, residents, and the resident responsible parties. LPA Lee interviewed 5 out of 5 residents who have no concerns with facility staff not ensuring that residents dietary needs are met. LPA Lee also interviewed 5 facility staff who denied the allegation. LPA Lee interviewed (R1)’s responsible party who has no concern with the food being served to (R1). LPA Lee also interviewed (R2) responsible party who also shares no concerns with the food being served to (R2). During 01/16/2024 LPA Lee observed for breakfast residents were served scrabble eggs, sausage, bacon, and biscuit. For lunch LPA Lee observed residents being served fish sticks, fries, salad, and green beans. For dinner LPA Lee observed residents being served pork chop, mash potatoes, salad, green beans, and apples. During today’s visit 03/12/2024, LPA Lee observed fruits and vegetables being served to residents during breakfast and lunch. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no deficiencies were observed during this visit.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was
|