1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Additionally, it was revealed through interviews that no corroborated statements existed which describe staff making inappropriate comments towards residents. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Allegation: Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner. LPA conducted interviews, observation, and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that staff are assisting residents as needed within appropriate amounts of time and providing adequate supervision during assistance. LPA’s observation did not reveal an inadequate response time to residents’ needs. Record reviews indicate staff are meeting residents’ needs timely in various activities of daily living (ADL) components. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Allegation: Staff did not meet resident’s bathing needs. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that staff are performing bathing assistance in an adequate and timely fashion. Records reviewed indicated various type of bathing needs for residents. These records indicate staff is completing bathing assistance needs for residents in care. Additionally, interviews did not reveal corroborated statements of staff not meeting residents’ bathing needs. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that Licensee maintains documentation adequate for tracking residents’ personal belongings along with options for residents’ to record what personal items are brought in and removed. Additionally, interviews conducted did not reveal any corroborated statements of staff mishandling or otherwise not safeguarding residents’ personal belongings. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. {Cont. on 9099C}
|