1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with two staff members and three residents. All staff interviewed denied excluded individuals presence at the facility and had knowledge they are not allowed at any licensed facility. The three residents interviewed denied witnessing any individuals identified in the complaint as being present at the facility or did not recognize photos of the identified individuals.
All staff interviewed knows who the administrator is. All three residents interviewed were able to identify who the facility administrator is and identified her most recent working date. All residents interviewed identified the administrator present on a regular basis.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Other are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed.
There are no deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22.
Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility. |