1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Moleski interviewed six other residents (R2-R6). R2 said that once, a staff member yelled at them. However, R2 said that they did not remember who the staff member was, or what exactly had happened. R3-R7 reported no concerns regarding staff conduct. S2-S5 reported no concerns regarding staff conduct.
S1 also said they had seen on daily care task sheets handwritten notes indicating that R1 could not have alcohol or sweets. LPA Moleski interviewed R1 in their room on 2/4/25, and observed alcohol and sweets present and accessible to R1. In an interview, R1 said that staff do not restrict their diet.
LPA Moleski reviewed daily care task sheets for the months of December and January and observed no notes indicating R1’s diet was to be restricted. LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s individual service plan, dated 8/27/24, which indicated R1 had no dietary restrictions. LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s LIC 602, which indicated that R1 consumes alcohol, and did not require any special dietary restrictions.
In interviews, multiple staff members said that, several months prior to this complaint being filed, R1 was drinking to excess, and suffered at least one fall around the same time. S2 said that staff were encouraging R1 to drink less, to avoid falling while inebriated. S4 said that staff were encouraging R1 to drink less to avoid negative complications with painkillers he was taking at the time. Both S2 and S4 said that R1 was allowed to drink as much as they wanted if they wanted more.
The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations that staff yell at residents, that staff threaten residents, and that staff are restricting food/drink from a resident:
Based on interviews, record review, and observation, the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED, which means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
No deficiencies were cited regarding the above allegations. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was left with Weininger.
This report was amended to correct an error in the use of confidential code identifiers. |