1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 7/29/2026, LPA was able to interview 2 residents. After showing photos of E1 and E2 and identifying them by their names, residents stated that E1 and E2 were not seen working at the facility. Note that the other residents were not able to be interviewed due to not being present at the facility during this visit and/or communication issues.
A review of the Personnel Report (LIC 500), dated 1/4/2026, showed that neither E1 nor E2 is listed as a facility employee.
During Department visits conducted on 1/5/2026, 1/15/2026, 2/20/2026, 7/23/2026, and 7/29/2026, there were no observations or reports of E1 or E2 being present or working at the facility.
Based on the information gathered through interviews, record reviews, and observations, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation that the facility allowed excluded individuals to work in the facility.
**************************************************************************************************
Allegation – Staff are forging resident documents: The investigation into this allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews.
LPA Villanueva contacted the doctor's offices listed on the residents' Medical Assessments (LIC 602A) to verify whether the residents had been seen by the physicians. LPA was able to reach three of the five phone numbers. However, the doctor's office staff stated they could not provide or verify patient information. On 7/23/2026, LPA interviewed both staff members who were working at the facility. Both staff members stated that they had never been asked by the administrator, management, or any other staff member to change, falsify, or forge resident documents. Furthermore, staff denied seeing or knowing any facility staff forging, falsifying, or altering resident documents.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation that staff are forging resident documents, therefore, the allegation that staff are forging resident documents was unsubstantiated.
A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened the preponderance of evidence does not prove it.
No deficiencies were cited as a result of this visit. Appeal process was discussed during the exit interview with Anese Warfield. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
{2 of 2}
|