1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
When asked if RP can provide more information, RP mentioned that "it's all done I don't want to talk about it anymore, I gotta go, bye bye" and hanged up the phone.
LPA Jamaly also called R1's emergency contact number on file, someone picked up the phone, LPA introduced self and explained the purpose of the call. The other side stated" you have called the wrong number".
LPA reviewed LIC 602A dated 10/29/2025. R1 isĀ marked as ambulatory at this time with dementia diagnosis, but needs assistance to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), including: Waking, bathing, dressing/grooming, feeding , toileting and medication management. LPA reviewed R1 assessment (change of condition) dated 1/31/2026 and ambulation status changed to non-ambulatory. Based on this document R1 uses a device to ambulate and needs a 1 person assist to use the device.
LPAs also reviewed incidents report for February and March 2026, no incident of abuse reported about R1.
Allegation: Staff made inappropriate comments about a resident
LPA contacted responsible party (RP), RP was not aware of the incident, and just stated that R1 is passed away on June 15, 2026 and the facility was terrible. RP didn't wanted to continue answering LPAs additional questions.
LPA Jamaly contact 3 out 5 housekeeping staff (S1, S2, S3, S4). S1 was not aware of the incident and hasn't heard about it from others. LPA contacted S2, S2 had hard time understanding English and interview was unsuccessful. LPA interview S4 about R1's incident fall and stated that S4 was not working at that day. S4 added that R1 was refusing the medication, and was saying nasty word to medication technician during medication time. S4 added that R1 was lashing out and didn't wanted to be at the facility. When asked if any staff was treating R1 inappropriately or saying inappropriate word, S4 stated that we had a medication technician who was straight forward/blunt to R1 when refusing the medication but S4 did not witnessed staff saying inappropriate words.
Based on LPA observations, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of , the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, and a copy of this report was provided. |