1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the course of the complaint investigation, LPA observed 2 cameras in the playroom, 1 in the nap room, 1 in the living room, 2 in the kitchen/dining room, and 4 in the outside play area. LPA observed the live feed from the cameras on an IPad displayed in the dining room/kitchen and on the Licensee’s and Assistant's phones. Licensee states that if she needs to the leave the room momentarily she watches the camera’s live feed on her phone, and the Assistant is always in close proximity to supervise the children in care. Licensee states that she may leave the room to prepare meals or to retrieve something from another room to bring to the children.
Interviews with parents do not support the allegation. Interviews with children reveal that the Licensee and Assistant are in the room watching and interacting with the children while they are playing and eating. If not both the Licensee and Assistant are supervising, one is supervising while the other is nearby.
Based on the interviews conducted, and the records reviewed, the above allegation was found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted by LPA Jennie Tedlos with Licensee, and Appeal Rights were provided. A Notice of Site Visit was posted by LPA and shall remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
|