1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff left residents unattended at the facility
Interviews conducted revealed that on 11/18/2024, S1 left the facility leaving no staff on the premises to care for the residents. S1 had left the facility sometime throughout the night. During interview, R1 stated that S1 had come into their room sometime throughout the night and stated that they will be leaving. R1 stated they went back to sleep and thought it was just a dream. When R1 and the other residents woke up in the morning of 11/18/2024, they found no staff present in the facility and attempted to make their own breakfast noting they were hungry. Interviews indicated R1 called their family in the morning of 11/18/2024 to notify that there were no staff present in the facility. Administrator stated they were unaware residents were left unattended until a R1's family member called and stated that there was no care staff at the facility. Administrator stated that they were notified around 9:30 a.m. and showed up to the facility at 10 a.m.
An interview with S1 confirmed that S1 did leave the facility stating they were not feeling well and needed medical attention. When asked if S1 contacted Administrator, S1 stated they called and left a voicemail message.
Administrator additionally stated that the staff has not been back at the facility since the incident.
Based on interviews conducted by the department, the preponderance of evidence standards has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is cited on the attached 9099-D page.
As a result of resident's being left without supervision, civil penalties are assessed in the amount of $500.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report and appeal rights provided. |