1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Administrator, Darius Stir, at the time of the incident, did not consult with the appropriately skilled professional to design a incontinence care program.
LPA also conducted a collateral visit at the facility R1 had relocated to. R1 was found to be out of bed. R1 was clean dry and odor free an R1’s bed/ bedding was odor free.
As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care.
Report reviewed with Samantha Shaw . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. |