1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the initial complaint visit on 2/3/24, LPA Ruth Wallace obtained a copy of a CA Food Handler Card effective 11/21/22 – 11/20/25 for witness#1 (W1). LPA Brown observed the food handler card that was in place prior to Community Care Licensing (CCL) receiving this complaint allegation. LPA Brown conducted interviews of R1-R5 on 6/18/24 which revealed that due to cognitive issues residents could not reasonably answer interview questions. However, R5 and R6 was able to state the food was good. An inquiry with Sutter Health revealed that for hospice residents, there are a lot of factors involved and it doesn’t equate to pounds although it is a decline, some are unable to be weighed, and a circumference measurement is taken of the left upper arm. The several factors involved are eating habits, diagnosis, edema, and diuretics. An interview with Bristol Hospice revealed that some residents on hospice has gained weight while others lost weight. And that this is not due to a food issue. An interview with LPA Ruth Wallace confirmed that the cook who prepares the main course for the meals has a current food handler certification. The food is prepared, frozen and transported to the facility. LPA Victoria Brown observed during visits on 5/30/24 and 6/18/24, that the main courses are frozen, labeled, dated, and contains instructions for cooking. S3 stated that unannounced visits are conducted to the kitchen and the facilities. All food is prepped according to all regulations. S2 stated the food is always a different variety. 1 of 4 of the responsible parties stated the quality of food has gone down in the past few months. The rest of the responsible parties stated the residents are given fresh fruits and vegetables as well as a variety of meals and there is not an issue with the food.
Regarding allegation, “Staff is not properly cleaning and sanitizing dishes and other utensils.
An interview with LPA Ruth Wallace revealed that the staff uses the dishwasher. S1 stated the dishwasher is always used. The responsible parties also stated the dishwasher is used by some and others washed the dishes by hand. Interviews on 5/30/24 and 6/18/24, all concur the dishes are not dirty nor broken and LPA Brown did not observe dirty dishes during the visits. S2 stated the dishwasher is used and there are no broken dishes. S3 stated the dishwasher has not needed repairs and it has its own water heater. The Administrator stated staff either wash the dishes or use the dishwasher.
Based on interviews, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. The allegations are deemed UNFOUNDED. “This agency has investigated the complaint alleging, the above-mentioned allegation(s). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint.”
An exit interview was conducted with Lorrena Goodenough via telephone and a copy of this report was provided via email and an electronic email read receipt confirms receiving these documents. |