1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation, “Staff do not maintain accurate residents' records” During interviews of staff #1 (S1-S4) on 6/24/24 and 1/10/25 LPA observed that staff are documenting Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) like medications, hygiene, bowel and urination, food, fluid, snacks, and weight. LPA observed facility records which document dates that residents receive showers, oral care, and weight gain or loss. During interviews with responsible parties (RP1 – RP4) conducted on 1/13/25 revealed that staff has been observed completing records or when asked has provided information regarding care from the records promptly. Based on interviews the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met.
Regarding allegation, “Staff do not ensure that residents' bathrooms are clean” During interviews of staff #1 (S1-S4) on 6/24/24 and 1/10/25 LPA obtained information that the bathrooms are cleaned as needed and on every shift. During interviews with responsible parties (RP1 – RP4) conducted on 1/13/25 revealed that the bathrooms have new accessible showers, and toilets and that the bathrooms contain necessary toiletries and are clean. Based on interviews the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met.
Regarding allegation, “Staff do not notify responsible parties of incidents” During interviews of staff #1 (S1-S4, S6) on 6/24/24 and 1/10/25 LPA observed that according to S6 some families are not responsive. S2-S4 stated that responsible parties are either contacted by the caregivers, Administrator, or Chief Operating Officer (COO/S1) which includes contacting 911 when things are serious. During interviews with responsible parties (RP1 – RP4) conducted on 1/13/25 revealed that all corroborate that staff are contacting them regarding incidents. Two out of the ten persons interviewed stated that contact was not made timely. A review of Incident reports submitted to Community Care Licensing indicate that staff is contacting the families and/or responsible parties regarding concerns with the residents. Based on interviews the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met.
Based on observations, interviews conducted, and records review, it was determined that the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, therefore the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged incident occurred.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies are being cited during this visit. Exit interview held. A copy of todays’ report provided. |