1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on interviews conducted with four (4) residents, the residents did not express that residents were not treated with respect.
LPA Valerio reviewed facility files. There was a staff member (S1) that was talked to by management staff regarding the way S1 allegedly spoke to a resident. S1 denied the allegation. LPA Valerio attempted to interview S1 but did not receive a call back.
Based on an interview with Administrator Ryan, they had a Resident Rights in-service
Allegation:
Facility does not ensure care is being provided when staff come in to “clear the call button.”
According to the RP, there are staff, specifically staff 1 (S1) who refuse to respond to call lights. The RP also stated that staff who are not direct care staff will come in to clear the lights but do not provide actual care. RP reported that the RP's call light was not answered until an hour and forty minutes later because the staff who answered could not physically assist the resident. When staff were finally available, the staff members said they were busy and "it was no their hall".
LPA Valerio reviewed facility files. Facility files revealed that S1 was written up on multiple occasions for call light response times longer than 15 minutes, S1 not helping other staff members, and S1 not answering call lights.
LPA Valerio reviewed resident council meeting minutes. For the month of February, March, and April, Call lights were one of the many topics discussed. LPA Valerio read a note that stated, ""Staff clear what the executive director termed the "emergency" call button, but may then leave only to assist the resident at a later time. Ryan stated when answering calls, staff have to give emergency needs priority. Revaluating a resident's needs may indicate that instead of relying on the call button, setting a regular time for assistance may be more appropriate. |