1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Valerio observed the forms to be signed by R1's authorized representative. LPA Valerio observed the preplacement appraisal dated prior to the admission date of R1. LPA Valerio observed the admission agreement signed by the authorized representative and dated one day prior to the admission date.
LPA Valerio observed the resident's admission date and observed R1's MAR. LPA Valerio observed that the resident was provided all prescribed medications, as evidenced by staff signing their initials on the MAR.
LPA Valerio was informed by Staff 1 (S1) that R1 was a new admission and was never provided an eviction notice.
LPA Valerio interviewed R1's authorized representative, which stated R1 was never provided an eviction notice from Golden Pond Retirement Community. R1's authorized representative confirmed the signatures on all documentation and confirm they are valid. R1's authorized representative stated Golden Pond has been a dream compared to R1's previous placement. R1 has been getting all of their medications, eats full meals, gets their laundry completed, and the staff are amazing.
Based on this information, the allegations are unfounded. A finding of unfounded means the allegations are false, could not have happened, or is without a reasonable basis.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) - Title 22, no deficiencies are being cited. An exit interview was held, and a copy of this report was provided. |