1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews with staff members S1, S2, S3, and residents R4, R5, R6, and R7 indicated that they have never observed the facility to be malodorous. Interview with ED indicated that, since starting at the facility, they have never observed the facility to be malodorous. During visits conducted on April 22, 2025 and April 23, 2025, LPA toured the premises, including the Memory Care Unit (MCU), and did not observe facility to be malodorous.
Allegation: Staff does not ensure facility is clean.
Interviews with S1, S2, S3, R4, R5, R6, and R7 indicated that they have never observed the facility to be unclean. Interviews with S1, S2, and S3 indicated that the facility does a good job with providing incontinence care to residents and ensuring facility is clean in case of an accident. Interview with ED indicated that, since starting at the facility, they have never observed the facility to be unclean. During visits conducted on April 22, 2025 and April 23, 2025, LPA toured the premises, including the MCU, and did not observe facility to be unclean.
Based on interviews conducted and observations, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Exit interview was conducted with ED. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. |