1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | C1’s caregiver, Staff 1 (S1), was listed as the primary contact person for C1, with a contact number on file C1’s PCP file. On 11/30/23, C1 had a telephone appointment where C1 were diagnosed with an upper respiratory infection. On 12/12/23 at 4:14 PM, C1’s primary care physician (PCP) called and left a message. On the same day, a request for a Levothyroxine refill was declined because C1 had not completed the necessary testing requested by the PCP. On 12/13/23, a second attempt was made to contact C1 by phone, but the call was unsuccessful, so a message was sent via Kaiser portal requesting that C1 book a telephone appointment. Another message was sent on 12/14/23 at 9:46 AM regarding C1’s medication, as previous phone attempts had been unsuccessful. On 12/15/23, C1 had a scheduled telephone appointment but did not attend ("no-show"). Despite phone calls being made and a message being left, there was no response. On 12/27/23 at 11:56 AM, a message was sent to C1 after the PCP attempted to contact C1 by phone without success.
On 01/15/24, C1 was admitted to the Kaiser Emergency Room for a cough and shortness of breath, where C1 was diagnosed with an acute upper respiratory infection (URI). The medical record from that visit indicated C1 had been experiencing a productive cough with yellow phlegm and difficulty breathing upon exertion for about a week. A follow-up appointment was scheduled for 01/16/24 at 12:00 PM, but C1 missed the appointment. At 12:09 PM, the PCP called C1 but received no answer, leaving a message. On 01/30/24 at 10:45 AM, C1 had another scheduled telephone appointment but was once again a “no-show.” Despite multiple attempts at 10:56 AM, 11:25 AM, and 11:44 AM to reach C1 and leaving messages, there was no response. On 02/01/24, C1 was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of septic shock caused by empyema and was placed in the ICU. C1’s chest CT revealed a large left peripheral enhancing fluid collection with an air-fluid level and debris. A catheter was placed, and intrapleural fibrinolytics were started. C1 was discharged on 02/16/24 to a rehabilitation facility. Based on the medical records and multiple missed appointments, it appears the facility did not ensure C1’s health condition was addressed promptly or that timely medical attention was sought. The repeated unsuccessful attempts by C1’s PCP to contact them, as well as the missed appointments, suggest that the necessary steps were not taken in a timely manner.
As a result, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the standard has been met. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Jennie Mcdavid and a copy of this LIC 9099, LIC 9099-D page and appeal rights provided to facility.
|