1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA observed two (2) medications for R2 that were off count and were under the amount documented and one (1) medication that was over the amount documented. LPA observed that R3 had one (1) medication that was off count and over the documented amount. There were several of R1, R2, and R3's medications that were not observed during the first medication count conducted.
During a visit conducted on 12/14/23, LPA conducted a medication count for R1, R2, and R3 comparing the residents' medication lists on file with medication centrally stored for the residents. LPA observed one (1) medication for R1 that was off count in relation to what was documented and was over the amount documented. LPA observed one (1) medication for R2 that was off count and was over the documented amount. No medication refusals were provided for either medication counts conducted on 10/25/23 and 12/14/23.
According to R1's medication list, R1 is prescribed to receive Insulin before meals. Interviews conducted with staff (S3, S4, & S5) indicated that they were on duty during the brunch event the facility held on 8/27/23. S3, S4, and S5 recall that there were no nurses on duty during the morning shift on 8/27/23. The nurse scheduled (S2) came in after the brunch event. According to the schedule provided to LPA, S2 was the only nurse scheduled on 8/27/23. S2 was scheduled for the PM shift starting at 2pm. S3 indicated that R1's responsible party was concerned that R1 had not received their insulin injection prior to mealtime as prescribed. Interview with S3 indicated that they spoke with S4 regarding R1's responsible party's concern regarding the insulin medication. Interview with S4 and S5 indicated that they assisted each other with providing insulin injections using the hand-over-hand method for any residents requiring insulin injections. S4 and S5 both recall that R1's insulin medication may have been given late during the brunch event on 8/27/23.
Based on interviews conducted, a medication count, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. |